The Public Banking Institute does not endorse, nor discourage the endorsement of, any particular candidates for public office. What we do instead is evaluate the individual policies of myriad candidates. We know that banking reform is a top priority of the two leading Democratic candidates. Hillary Clinton is rightly perceived to be a few degrees less radical than Bernie Sanders in her approach to banks. She would not restore Glass Steagall, nor would she proactively break up the big banks. What would she do?Read more
Colorado’s diverse economy, recently given a boost by revenue from legal marijuana distribution, is generally in good shape. But as of early 2016. Denver Public Schools, the largest school district in the state, was hobbling economically, cutting as many as 170 faculty and staff positions.Read more
After years of watching cities finance their budgets and beat up on the poor by throwing people in jail for unpaid fines, tickets, and other public debts, the U.S. Department of Justice is finally taking action.Read more
In recent months, the Public Banking Institute has had to clarify to some of our supporters and followers who post messages on our social media and other public forums, that we strongly reject without exception any derogatory statements or hints of racist, anti-Semitic, and anti-Islamic rhetoric in connection with financial, monetary and banking reform movements worldwide.Read more
What does it say when a former hip hop innovator, who now makes money off the backs of poor people with his predatory financial products, declares himself "to the left of Bernie Sanders," and then endorses Hillary Clinton?
We don't endorse or attack candidates at PBI. We want everyone thinking about public banks--including public consumer banks like postal banks--and we think that unchecked privatization of financial services and a huge shareholder profit motive hurt governments, communities, small businesses, and people. We feel the same way about predatory payday lenders as we do about the Wall Street firms robbing billions of dollars from our cities and states. In both instances we ask: Why do we allow these private entities to run so many things?Read more
“The basic idea of modern postal banking,” Mehrsa Baradaran writes in How the Other Half Banks, “is a public bank offering a wide range of transaction services, including financial transactions, remittance, savings accounts, and small lending. These institutions would remain affordable because of economies of scale and because of the existing postal infrastructure in the U.S. Plus, in the absence of shareholders, they would not be driven to seek profits and could sell services at cost.”
Baradaran is right--particularly about postal economies of scale and the potential of postal banking to improve the quality of life for poor people. And the idea periodically rises to the surface of American news headlines because, as Bernie Sanders's campaign demonstrates (whatever its outcome), the economic insecurity of half of America is a big deal.
Last week, Arizona became the latest state to advance a public banking bill out of committee in its state legislature. Like most initial public banking bills, this legislation mandates a task force with the aim of recommendations and feasibility pronouncements. It won't get us a North Dakota-style public bank tomorrow, but it's a strong start, particularly given the strength of the 6-1 committee vote.Read more
This week, the Maryland House of Delegates' Economic Matters Committee will hold hearings on HB0794, which amends section 1-212 of Maryland's Code to authorize political entities in the state to establish public banks, and calls for the study and evaluation of a Maryland State Bank.Read more